|
Please share this notice with others:

Introducing THATCamp Kentucky
This June 1-2, 2013, the University of Kentucky will be hosting in the W.T. Young Library the first THATCamp in the state of Kentucky. We’re hoping to attract students and scholars of all levels and experience who are interested in the intersection of technology and the humanities (broadly defined). THATCamp is an “unconference” which means that (among other things) what we do during the camp is entirely up to you, the participants. All you need to bring is your laptop or tablet computer and your ideas. THATCamp is also affordable; in fact, there isn’t a registration fee at all.
Registration is now open at http://kentucky2013.thatcamp.org. You can read more about what is a THATCamp at http://thatcamp.org/about/. Please spread the word and apply today come to Lexington on June 1-2. You can also send questions to thatcampky@gmail.com. |
| One Billion Rising
On February 14, for 24 hours starting at midnight (Pacific), Second Life residents will join with activists around the world in a spectacular 24-hour dance event for ONE BILLION RISING. This will be the largest day of action in the history of V-Day, the global activist movement to end violence against women and girls. More info including a full schedule of events at onebillionrisingsl.wordpress.com. |
|
On December 13, 1818, Mary Ann Todd was born in Lexington, Kentucky. She was the fourth child of Eliza Ann Parker and Robert Smith Todd, and she would grow up to marry the Kentucky-born Abraham Lincoln - eventually becoming the nation's first "First Lady." Museums and historical organizations have celebrated her birthday (following up on the popularity of the latest spate of Lincoln books and movies), and I was honored these last few weeks to be invited to contribute my writings. You are welcome to read them:
- December 13 - presentation at the Bluegrass Heritage Museum in Winchester "Mary Lincoln: Mad? or Just Angry?" included slides and a handout (which are not included here)
- December 23 - "Mary Lincoln's Kentucky Roots," an essay on the request of Gwen Thompson of the Mary Todd Lincoln House here in Lexington for an entry in an exhibition's catalog being compiled by
R. Dale Ogden, Senior Curator of Cultural History, Indiana State Museum & Historic Sites, 650 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, IN. 46204 |
|
In finishing up this week a connectivist MOOC on the future of higher education (EdFuture.net), I began reading Martin Weller's book, The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice (2011). I hadn't read it before and found many parts of it very helpful. In chapter 4 Weller discusses different definitions of "scholarship" and how the Internet and digital technologies have crafted new channels of communications and scholarly practice.
http://www.bloomsburyacademic.com/view/DigitalScholar_9781849666275/chapter-ba-9781849666275-chapter-004.xml#
Weller writes:
"Digital scholarship is more than just using information and communication technologies to research, teach and collaborate; it also includes embracing the open values, ideology and potential of technologies born of peer-to-peer networking and wiki ways of working in order to benefit both the academy and society."
At the University of Kentucky, Dr. Jenny Rice heads up a cross-disciplinary Digital Public Humanities Group that works together on digital projects. Would it be appropriate for this group of faculty, librarians and administrative staff to also take on some of the work associated with changing the university cultural notions on what "scholarship" is?
I'm looking in particular at the UK Administrative Regs on the appointment, reappointment, promotion and granting of tenure in regular title series (AR II 1.0-1, V-B - http://www.uky.edu/regs/files/ar/ar2-2-1.pdf)
There's a section that refers to "Research and Other Creative Activity" and states as follows:
-
Faculty employees have a responsibility for the creation of knowledge. Scholarship related to research or creative endeavors shall be original, of high quality, and validated by rigorous peer review. Communication of the work’s significance to the scholarly community and to the public at large is a component of the mission of the University and, therefore, its evaluation is an integral part of the promotion and tenure process. The documented quality of research and/or creative scholarship shall be an integral component of the promotion and tenure evaluation process as appropriate given the faculty employee’s assignment.
-
Evidence of recognition of research or creative activity and its long-lasting merit and worth is expected. Normally, publication in the form considered as appropriate for the field will constitute this evidence.
-
In addition to the more traditional methods of presentation, examples of creative scholarship include public performances and exhibitions, audio and visual recordings, applications of technical innovations and other products.
and then in Appendix II on the Faculty Workload Policy Statement
http://www.uky.edu/regs/files/ar/ar3-8.pdf:
"Faculty workload includes formal classroom instruction, from undergraduate through postdoctoral levels, which may be measured by semester credit hours; laboratory, studio, and clinical contact hours; and informal non-classroom teaching. Workload includes research, or those activities that have as their goal a specific scholarly production, whether it be non-sponsored, individual research, or organized research supported by extramural funding. Workload also includes external service activities performed by faculty members on behalf of the general public, and internal service, or work on behalf of colleagues, students, and University units, and professional activities. While teaching, research, and service may be regarded as separate activities, in practice, these three workload components are rarely distinct. Administrative flexibility is required to assign and assess research, service, and teaching."
Would it be useful for the Digital Public Humanities Group to have a sort of University-wide Reading Club that takes on a discussion of Weller's open book and situates its arguments within the University of Kentucky's own definitions of research and scholarship, teaching and service?
In chapter 3, Weller asks us to consider the "types of outputs generated in higher education" and to re-conceptualize how universities distribute new knowledge. His "Table 7.1 University content matched to open, distributed channels" is particularly helpful in its connecting traditional forms of scholarly production with Internet-based digital technologies:
|
OUTPUT |
TYPE OF OUTLET |
EXAMPLE |
|
Data |
Data repositories |
|
|
Research paper |
Open access journals, repositories, individual websites |
|
|
Software code |
Open source repositories |
|
|
Lectures/teaching content |
OER projects, learning repositories, commercial sites |
|
|
Ideas, proposals |
Individual sites |
Blogs, Twitter, YouTube |
|
Conferences, seminars |
Conference sites |
TED talks, YouTube, Twitter hashtag, Cloudworks |
|
Debate, discussion |
Public engagement sites, subject community forums |
Blogs, Twitter, discussion boards |
The University of Kentucky's Public Relations unit generates (and controls) the content produced in the above types of communication channels (e.g., http://www.youtube.com/user/UKseeblue) and points from the University's front page only to its own channels rather than to a compendium of University faculty research and outreach. For example, when visitors clicks on "See more" about UK's research, they are directed to a single, static article on one person from the College of Medicine. Despite innovative principles of openness in the digital age, such as The Open Science Recommendations in 2008 from Science Commons, the University of Kentucky's emphasis on its core mission - that of research - is portrayed on its home pages as closed and hermetically sealed. Under "Research at UK," visitors are directed to an administrative unit where, again, news items generated by a public relations individual regale the reader with print-style texts.
It seems to me to say that the only way you get to know about research - and researchers - at the University of Kentucky is from behind a fence. Inside, they are obviously working hard on many wonderful discoveries. But do not touch - do not interact - their work is distilled and summarized for you to consume and - someday, somehow - become enlightened on your own. They are busy in their own closed enclosure, talking with themselves while we watch from afar and then move along. |
| In the readings for the MOOC on the current/future state of education, EdFuture, I found this quotation:
"Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe." H.G. Wells, (1866-1946) The Outline of History (1920) Ch. 41
While this might seem a big extreme to many, it has been underlying many conversations for those of us in the business of education. Change is coming - and it's coming fast.  Drew Faust, president of Harvard University and historian, on change management. Her interview focuses on what she's learned from Lincoln and what the Civil War teaches us about the human tendency to resist change. Her recommendations for higher education leaders are compelling: to work closely with the very people who are impacted the most by that change. Yet, this short interview does not address how leadership can best "work with" those who are at such a distance from the leadership in both economic and powerholding status. In a time of great disruption and distrust on all sides, there is much to be done to address the chasms between values and beliefs that is becoming more evident every day inside and around higher education.
In a guest blog post for CHE's ProfHacker last year by Janine Utell of Widener University (" Practical Wisdom and Professional Life," 25 February 2011) I found a reference to a Nov 2010 TED Talk by Barry Schwartz. In Utell's post she urges those of us who are feeling constrained in a rules-bound higher ed institution to imagine becoming what Schwartz called the "uncanny outlaw." Schwartz studies the link between economics and psychology - and he warns in his book with Kenneth Sharpe ( Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to Do the Right Thing) that we are losing our "practical wisdom." We have by relying on more and more rules and expecting incentives in order to do our work, we have lost the very thing that a democracy relies on to function properly: our virtue. This means we as educators need to learn (and how to teach others to learn) "the right way to do the right thing in a particular circumstance, with a particular person, at a particular time." But it's not just the "outlaws" (or, as I was once called, a "lone wolf"), but also the "system changers" (what I hope I have become as I moved into higher education administration here at the University of Kentucky). Schwartz gives a great speech to encourage us to become the part of the change, not victims of it:
The great Kentuckian, Wendell Berry, in his Jefferson Lecture at the National Endowment for the Humanities last April, spoke eloquently on behalf of those who believe in imagination and especially those who imagine the future of higher education. Rather than the Aristotlian virtue that Schwartz and Sharpe focus on in their book, Berry asserts that " It All Turns on Affection." He warns us in his eloquent way that we have lost our connection with "the land" and that at the core of ourselves in the U.S. we do best when we are connected locally to each other in a community. Berry is speaking about his aversion to "the rule of industrial economics," but we can use this same lesson in higher education. He fears our country "has been pillaged for the enrichment, supposedly, of those humans who have claimed the right to own or exploit it without limit." In his speech, he fears "much has been consumed, much has been wasted, almost nothing has flourished." This is what has been said of higher education today. Yet, unlike what has been stated by many higher education reformers who seek stronger leadership under plans of stringent austerity, Berry says we will be destroyed without an "informed, practical, and practiced affection." |
| Whether we in higher ed choose to look or not, we've got them: ribosomes. Some roam free and some are bound in place - but they exist in every living cell and are best observed at the atomic level.

In the Edfuture MOOC, we're studying Big Data and Analytics this week. If we agree that learning analytics is more than just metrics projected on a ledger sheet, then we can envision the strategic plan behind the metrics... and how it can be revised or even destroyed. In Jacqueline Bichsel's "Analytics in Higher Education: Benefits, Barriers, Progress, and Recommendations (Research Report)" for ECAR in August 2012, we learned that analytics is a process that has the following steps:
(a) starting with a strategic question, (b) finding or collecting the appropriate data to answer that question, (c) analyzing the data with an eye toward prediction and insight, (d) representing or presenting findings in ways that are both understandable and actionable, and (e) feeding back into the process of addressing strategic questions and creating new ones (p. 6).
Sally Johnstone, Vice President for Academic Advancement at Western Governors University, says they have a clear understanding of what "student success" is and all the different components of this nontraditional university work toward these common understandings in their everyday activities and in their strategic planning (see the two minute video of her interview here on Vimeo). Many times these concepts and design infrastructures are left behind administrative doors and the students are left to navigate the system on their own - see Tristan Denley speaking on how the students at Austin Peay are encouraged to use institutional data to make informed decisions in their choices of learning pathways (see the Vimeo of Provost Denley here).
Think of learning analytics and think of ribosomes. In the animation above, you see a ribosome (a learning environment that facilitates all the processes). The dark blue tRNA (course mentors? faculty? teaching assistants? peer mentors?) follow the codes laid out by the mRNA (the academic discipline? the major?) and bring the amino acids (lessons in a curriculum? assessible problems to solve as students work toward course goals?) to the ribosome to be integrated into the final chain to create the proteins (final projects? capstone experiences?) to fuel all living organisms.
We too often envision higher education as a sort of two-dimensional linear experience: freshman then sophomore then junior then senior then graduation then career (or graduate school which becomes the gateway for other careers). There is much we can learn about the interrelationships and moving parts inherent to learning analytics.
P.S. I wish to thank my daughter, a science geek currently at Vassar College and whose work has already been published in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, for helping me to explain this analogy. If the analogy is still an awkward fit, it is my fault for not learning more from her as she explained the biological principles to me last night. |
| As part of the Edfuture MOOC, we've been asked to consider this week the topic of entrepreneurship and commercial activity in education. I was particularly impressed with the October 22 webinar with Debra Quazzo, founder of the GSV Advisors and an education investor herself. Speaking at breakneck speed, she showered us with facts about the transformation of higher education - and that the speed of change is dramatically increasing. With slides labeled "confidential" she told us where the energy is happening ("heatmaps") and that Stanford University is the "vanguard of the revolution" in education innovation. There is "frenzy" in the LMS space, or, as Quazzo put it with an interestingly sports-based visual "The LMS Scrum" where formerly closed/proprietary systems have begun to acquire open/community systems (e.g., Blackboard acquired ANGEL then Moodlerooms). Meanwhile, she asserts that "since books will not be the business of the future," Pearson is a company to watch as it moves into the future "aggressively via acquisition, internal development and partnership." Investers are watching the future unfold in ways that can be described in these following themes:
- Big Data: "pressure for accountability and assessment seemingly perpetuate across all higher education"
- Link to Career: outsourced instruction on career pathways and personal tutoring is taking over the traditional career center services on brick-and-mortar campuses
- Knowledge as a Currency: the "personal knowledge exchange" is growing past the traditional credentials of higher education with Mozilla, Codeacademy, myEdu, etc.
Quazzo ended her talk with an important lesson for us all. For education innovation to "stick," companies and organizations must "deliver a higher ROE" that is, a return on education. This includes higher visibility of learning outcomes achieved, accessibility, and capacity - while at the same time decreasing cost.
At the ASU/GSV Education Innovation Summit 2012 in Scottsdale last April, GSV Advisors offered up a 93-page document of company profiles poised to redefine the traditional models of education.
http://gsvadvisors.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GSV-ASU-EdInnovation-Summit-2012-Company-Profiles.pdf
I have quickly scanned the document and list the following three that intrigued me the most:
- Artistotle Circle (www.aristotlecircle.com) founded in 2008 out of New York City that "leverages social networking, local word of mouth referrals and regional commission-based advisors" in a "hyper-local business model" that offers child assessment, peer tutoring services for preparation, and guidance in school admissions. Even as the elite schools begin offering open access to their most prized lecturers, the haves-and-have-nots culture in an increasingly conservative U.S. continues.
- Corporate University Xchange (www.corpu.com) out of Mechanicsburg, PA is rising on the global corporate training market with is set to double in five years. Using a multi-year subscription agreement for both research and executive education programs, the CorpU Academy uses a social-learning platform and content accessible via mobile devices to connect subscribers' employees "to solve complex problems, generate and spread ideas, teach and learning, and capture and share knowledge." I thought that's what higher education was in business to do?
- Educurious (www.educurious.org) has a deep bench of executives with experience and has been funded by the Gates Foundation to "break down the barriers between the classroom and the real world, increases students' self-confidence and competencies as they solve real problems and see the results of their work, expands student's career possibilities by connecting them to experts from a range of careers and professions through the Educurious Expert Network (TEEN)." They are going for the top skills that employers want to see coming out of our schools: collaboration, communication and technology skills. They are using "standards-aligned" lessons with gaming and badges for mastery using "personalized learning pathways" to address the growing drop-out rates (and/or school-to-prison pipelines). They're working with the University of Washington College of Education and the Institute for Math and Science. Sounds to me like they need humanities experts too or else the most important components of ethics, critical thinking and creativity will be lost in a barrage of social science "rock on rock" learning.
These are just a few of the extraordinary profiles I stumbled across. I'll continue to peruse this document, but I'd love to hear from you. Which companies are your favorites to think about and why? |
|
The EdFuture MOOC led by George Siemans (of the connectivist MOOC ilk) asks us here in Week 2 to think about "Net pedagogies" that is, "New models of teaching and learning."
I was so sure going into this course that phrases like "Net pedagogies" or "flipped classrooms" are simply rehashing of previously demonstrated good teaching practices with new bells and whistles for marketing purposes. However, when presented with the Week 2 Activities Discussion Questions, I took a step back. This is larger than a personal approach or a group of like-minded educators. We have to think in more systemic ways in order to become a part of the change in higher education (rather than victims of it). So, I reflect here on the assigned questions:
****
Week 2 Activities Discussion Questions
1. Map what you are hearing to your institutional context. What parts are relevant to your institution?
2. What might be your role in moving your school to a new model?
3. Write a dialog/argument you would make to sell the administration on the idea of moving to a new model.
****
Part of the reading and resources for this week were the wonderful EDUCAUSE and ELI resources on "Blended Learning" models, including the toolkit and resource guide from UCF (which I used in developing the UK Faculty Toolkit), the report from Diaz and Brown from a 2012 ELI Focus Session, and the terrific idea of using " Blended Learning Class Guides," coming out of the vibrant ANGEL user community (now defunct due to colonization by the Blackboard LMS vendor-think) at Penn State. In addition, I visited this week a dear friend at the University of Pittsburg, for whom I have the highest respect as a civil rights activist and as a designer of education reform practices. She told me that she was designing the U Pitt courses to be included in the Coursera initiative - with some real successes in mind.
The prospect of bringing to my own university a policy-and-purpose-driven approach to blended learning that includes Open Educational Resources (OER) seems overwhelming. As an educational administrator in an institution that is currently undergoing very real change with a new president and reorganization of academic leadership under fiscal duress, I am humbled by how we at the University of Kentucky might include OER as a positive force for change. We do not yet have an administrative or faculty culture that embraces the use of the Internet (unless it securely mimics what has traditionally occured in our paper-based, face-to-face practices and processes). Any UK faculty leader who declares their adoption of the "flipped classroom" model is greeted with cautious skepticism, and the dialog if any most often focuses on efficient use of resources (instructional costs or freeing up coveted classroom space) rather than on how best to sustain educational quality or offer new forms of access to the state's flagship institution.
In an institution where a fiscally oriented "academic technologies" unit determines whether or not an innovative practice is supported centrally (not the academic mission or purpose of the educational initiative), there are many barriers to map what I am learning in this MOOC to what is happening here at the University of Kentucky. However, I will attempt to use the strategies recommended by Samuel Nikoi and Alejandro Armellini ("The OER Mix in Higher Education: Purpose, Process, Product, and Policy," Distance Education, 33:2, 165-184) to reflect on how the University could move to a new model of teaching/learning, research, educational outreach and service.
Nokoi and Armellini studied the administrative, faculty and student perspectives on Open Educational Resources at two British universities: the University of Leicester (where the OTTER project released over 400 credits' worth of OER in 13 subject areas) and the University College Falmouth in Cornwall. Their findings included a discussion of what they called the "OER mix framework" of product, price, promotion and place. The different mixes of the "four Ps" yielded different results for the different stakeholders they interviewed and surveyed. These findings correspond very well with what I have observed at the University of Kentucky in the past (e.g., in a white paper, " Moving On: Distance Education at UK," 2010) and today.
OER Model Stakeholder |
Purpose (altruistic + marketing motives) |
Process (clarity of design for quality of content/format + sustainable) |
Product (partnership opportunities, licensing + fiscal support) |
Policy (reward/recognition, quality standards, enhanced technical infrastructure) |
| Administrators (staff and faculty leaders) |
visibility and marketing |
reinforces institutional reputation/brand |
potential to undermine distance ed programs |
internal sharing can improve standards in course design/delivery |
| Faculty (instructors and researchers) |
resource similar to books, can improve quality and student satisfaction |
attract local/international students and improve global educational standards |
copyright laws needed but can be too restrictive for use and repurposing |
reward mechanisms to push practice-informed OER policy (vs. policy-driven practices), multiple platforms to assure access anytime, anywhere |
| Students (current and potential) |
free access, media-rich supplemental resources |
promotes distance/work-based learning, resource for self-learning |
access to high quality content by subject matter experts |
diversity in materials/sources, promotes scholarly affiliations across disciplines for trust, promotes social inclusion and learner transitions to higher education |
The argument I might make then can be about OER and the importance of focused attention to "Net pedagogies" in the framework of a mix of the above 4 Ps. This can happen in various ways, e.g.,
- policy discussions among administrators and faculty leaders, especially in new programming being developed such as dual credit initiatives with secondary schools or transitional programming for underserved student populations
- process brainstorming with faculty instructional leaders and student support directors for example in supporting best practices in experiential education and service learning
- product creation and maintenance with faculty subject matter experts, staff in support services units, and graduate students or undergraduate peer mentors
- purpose driven language in all of the above settings
For me, the purpose of the University's involvement in OER work - and a resulting investment in the development and sustained support for OER products and policies - has to do with the unique place Kentucky has in the world. As one of the poorest and sickest populations in the U.S., Kentuckians deserve more from their flagship institution. As part of a service learning intiative (and not based on a kind of social worker's missionary zeal or a sense of guilt for living in this guarded oasis of wealth and health), the University could work toward its land-grant mission and truly evidence its role as Kentucky's flagship institution by moving to a new model of openness and inclusion. |
|
We were asked in a discussion forum for the Edfutures MOOC to think about change drivers in higher ed. Lots of choices presented by others, very convincingly. Mine was "our youth" with not much to back it up, just an assumption that has been building up since I first began to understand why I wanted to become an educator... and wrote my M.A.T. project at Colgate U on the educative power of the community-based learning strategies of Foxfire. When I came to the University of Kentucky as an administrator, I had already become a fervent adherent for:
- Dee Fink's taxonomy for learning and course design for "significant learning" outcomes;
- the MarylandOnline FIPSE grant that produced the Quality Matters project of faculty peer review of course design;
- Henry Jenkins's white paper for the MacArthur Foundation on the widening gap between the culture of learning valued by educators and the "participatory culture" of youth coming up out of a new digital world infused with a knowledge-based economy and globalization;
- James Paul Gee's books on gamification of education for good learning
- and all the rest began to tumble in fast... I became addicted to the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative's Horizon Reports and gobbled up each time the latest batch of statistics coming out of the Pew Internet & American Life Project.
And here I am again - seduced by the latest survey from EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research in 2012 which is following the techno-culture gap between educators and students. They are finding that the expectations and goals are beginning to match up better "In 2010, 47% of students said most of their instructors were using technology effectively. This year that figure was 68%" - this statement from the Inside Higher Ed article on the ECAR 2012 report jumped out at me. I feel this trend may be an important indicator that our youth are now moving into the lower ranks of academe to offer a different climate in the classroom than ever before. At the same time, there may be a maturation of what our undergraduates today may be seeking as they confront their professors' expectations for active learning: OER, gaming, ebooks and videos. Here's the infographic summarizing the types of technologies that students wish their instructors would use more:

|
View in Web Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/VisioWebAccess/VisioWebAccess.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType vdw 255 Manage Subscriptions /_layouts/images/ReportServer/Manage_Subscription.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ManageSubscriptions.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x80 0x0 FileType rdl 350 Manage Data Sources /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DataSourceList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType rdl 351 Manage Shared Datasets /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DatasetList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType rdl 352 Manage Parameters /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ParameterList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 353 Manage Processing Options /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ReportExecution.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 354 Manage Cache Refresh Plans /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/CacheRefreshPlanList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 355 View Report History /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ReportHistory.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x40 FileType rdl 356 View Dependent Items /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DependentItems.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsds 350 Edit Data Source Definition /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/SharedDataSource.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsds 351 View Dependent Items /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DependentItems.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType smdl 350 Manage Clickthrough Reports /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ModelClickThrough.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType smdl 352 Manage Model Item Security /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ModelItemSecurity.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x2000000 FileType smdl 353 Regenerate Model /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/GenerateModel.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType smdl 354 Manage Data Sources /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DataSourceList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType smdl 351 Load in Report Builder /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/RSAction.aspx?RSAction=ReportBuilderModelContext&list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x2 FileType smdl 250 Edit in Report Builder /_layouts/images/ReportServer/EditReport.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/RSAction.aspx?RSAction=ReportBuilderReportContext&list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 250 Edit in Report Builder /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/RSAction.aspx?RSAction=ReportBuilderDatasetContext&list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 250 Manage Caching Options /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DatasetCachingOptions.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 350 Manage Cache Refresh Plans /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/CacheRefreshPlanList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId}&IsDataset=true 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 351 Manage Data Sources /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DataSourceList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType rsd 352 View Dependent Items /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DependentItems.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 353 Compliance Details javascript:commonShowModalDialog('{SiteUrl}/_layouts/itemexpiration.aspx?ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}', 'center:1;dialogHeight:500px;dialogWidth:500px;resizable:yes;status:no;location:no;menubar:no;help:no', function GotoPageAfterClose(pageid){if(pageid == 'hold') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+'/_layouts/hold.aspx?ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;} if(pageid == 'audit') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+'/_layouts/Reporting.aspx?Category=Auditing&backtype=item&ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;} if(pageid == 'config') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+'/_layouts/expirationconfig.aspx?ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;}}, null); return false; 0x0 0x1 ContentType 0x01 898 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XsnLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 FileType xsn 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document.2 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document.3 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document.4 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType xlsx 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType xlsm 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType xlsb 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType ods 255 Document Set Version History javascript:SP.UI.ModalDialog.ShowPopupDialog('{SiteUrl}/_layouts/DocSetVersions.aspx?List={ListId}&ID={ItemId}') 0x0 0x0 ContentType 0x0120D520 330 Send To other location javascript:GoToPage('{SiteUrl}/_layouts/docsetsend.aspx?List={ListId}&ID={ItemId}') 0x0 0x0 ContentType 0x0120D520 350 |
|
|
|
|
| There are no items to show in this view of the "Pages" document library. |  |
| View in Web Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/VisioWebAccess/VisioWebAccess.aspx?listguid={ListId}&itemid={ItemId}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType vdw 255 Manage Subscriptions /_layouts/images/ReportServer/Manage_Subscription.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ManageSubscriptions.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x80 0x0 FileType rdl 350 Manage Data Sources /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DataSourceList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType rdl 351 Manage Shared Datasets /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DatasetList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType rdl 352 Manage Parameters /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ParameterList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 353 Manage Processing Options /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ReportExecution.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 354 Manage Cache Refresh Plans /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/CacheRefreshPlanList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 355 View Report History /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ReportHistory.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x40 FileType rdl 356 View Dependent Items /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DependentItems.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsds 350 Edit Data Source Definition /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/SharedDataSource.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsds 351 View Dependent Items /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DependentItems.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType smdl 350 Manage Clickthrough Reports /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ModelClickThrough.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType smdl 352 Manage Model Item Security /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/ModelItemSecurity.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x2000000 FileType smdl 353 Regenerate Model /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/GenerateModel.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType smdl 354 Manage Data Sources /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DataSourceList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType smdl 351 Load in Report Builder /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/RSAction.aspx?RSAction=ReportBuilderModelContext&list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x2 FileType smdl 250 Edit in Report Builder /_layouts/images/ReportServer/EditReport.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/RSAction.aspx?RSAction=ReportBuilderReportContext&list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rdl 250 Edit in Report Builder /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/RSAction.aspx?RSAction=ReportBuilderDatasetContext&list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 250 Manage Caching Options /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DatasetCachingOptions.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 350 Manage Cache Refresh Plans /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/CacheRefreshPlanList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId}&IsDataset=true 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 351 Manage Data Sources /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DataSourceList.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x20 FileType rsd 352 View Dependent Items /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/ReportServer/DependentItems.aspx?list={ListId}&ID={ItemId} 0x0 0x4 FileType rsd 353 Compliance Details javascript:commonShowModalDialog('{SiteUrl}/_layouts/itemexpiration.aspx?ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}', 'center:1;dialogHeight:500px;dialogWidth:500px;resizable:yes;status:no;location:no;menubar:no;help:no', function GotoPageAfterClose(pageid){if(pageid == 'hold') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+'/_layouts/hold.aspx?ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;} if(pageid == 'audit') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+'/_layouts/Reporting.aspx?Category=Auditing&backtype=item&ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;} if(pageid == 'config') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+'/_layouts/expirationconfig.aspx?ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;}}, null); return false; 0x0 0x1 ContentType 0x01 898 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XsnLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 FileType xsn 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document.2 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document.3 255 Edit in Browser /_layouts/images/icxddoc.gif /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/formserver.aspx?XmlLocation={ItemUrl}&OpenIn=Browser&Source={Source} 0x0 0x1 ProgId InfoPath.Document.4 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType xlsx 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType xlsm 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType xlsb 255 View in Browser /UGE/IAS/MyDay/_layouts/xlviewer.aspx?id={ItemUrl}&DefaultItemOpen=1 0x0 0x1 FileType ods 255 Document Set Version History javascript:SP.UI.ModalDialog.ShowPopupDialog('{SiteUrl}/_layouts/DocSetVersions.aspx?List={ListId}&ID={ItemId}') 0x0 0x0 ContentType 0x0120D520 330 Send To other location javascript:GoToPage('{SiteUrl}/_layouts/docsetsend.aspx?List={ListId}&ID={ItemId}') 0x0 0x0 ContentType 0x0120D520 350 |
|
|
|